GEO Watch | Protegendisque scientifica
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjeDpPkOGDwyREJ1_APigMAqVV3X4ZjuEenUBsN2YIdwFAL1pgMltiVDh_uAtHcvGv0KueldmMrSIhXPuIxcaR92rFqU_MhFsvaayxBuXsuow5cy7AWXIHa3N-AcHrTiBNLM_gjm27vtf8/s1600/8d_Solaas_d_29140312_vacation_resize-800x600.jpg)
Art courtesy of Leonardo Solaas, Dreamlines (2006). Credit | x-traonline Moderator’s Note: There are thousands in the professional ranks of scientists who have cast their lot with Monsanto et al under deals involving corporate sponsorship of research. When you are seen as selling out, and thus riddled with conflicts of interest, there are consequences: One is the erosion of the public credibility of scientists seen as blemished by their association with powerful corporate interests. As a result, they are increasingly plagued by a declining lack of legitimacy in the public sphere. Biotech scientists are increasingly perceived as servants of power guilty of “screening factual evidence”. Friends of the Earth (FOE) - Europe has released a report (see press release and links below) on GMO crops that describes in detail the structure of benefits accruing from the deployment of agricultural biotechnologies. There are few surprises here since the primary benefits continue to accrue to ...