I-522 | Part 3 in a Series on the Washington State Initiative for GMO Labeling
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWJfhJ-f3oO0xgnSwSfXBRO66VDxu-8SYoFeoR_DJ-Y7wRavKAJtxgbgOnxbSxR_4nRBhmx1a5YL0IAp7eRhwV6xyuoiy7HODIlB62VNm76FY4U2eiD_K3KmTbxnuCDFWhiB2GGuNw5qw/s1600/gmo-no.png)
GMO Myths and half-truths HEALTH RISKS ARE A MATTER OF UNCERTAINTY AND ONGOING SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY Devon G. Peña | Seattle, WA | October 15, 2013 My simple rule for food safety is: If you are unsure then don’t eat it. The logic behind this rule is sometimes called the “Precautionary Principle” – I will call it P 2 – and its intent is to place due value on the protection of public health and the environment. This ethical standard that has been widely adopted by many scientists , and public health agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) including many who are concerned with the uncertainty surrounding the study of the risks of GMO foods. The question is: Are we as a society willing to commit to the side of safety until the scientific uncertainties about GMO food safety are resolved? The question is: Are we as a society willing to commit to the side of safety until the scientific uncertainties about GMO food safety are resolved? Or, will we risk sacrificing our health and that...